What`s the Definition of Safety

Britannica English: Translation of Security for Arabic speakers Many government agencies set security standards for matters within their jurisdiction, such as: I would say that defining security is like trying to define “common sense.” Once you find the answer, it changes. Customers are notified within 48 hours in advance that their electricity will be cut off – this is called a public safety power outage. Even in my small sample, it was reported that “security” is a feeling, a physical object, or a physical place, and an action. For others, “safety” referred to something personal, individual, and intimate – a felt experience – while for others, the word was extended to the environment – animate or inanimate – in which people lived or worked. If a handful of definitions of “security” may exist right under my nose, I am fascinated to discover how “security” is conceptualized, perceived, and experienced. I`m certainly wondering what impact this has on the “security initiatives” being implemented in organizations around the world. Is there a common understanding of what the concept means and how it is implemented at different levels in a company? Is this concept reinforced or sabotaged by existing systems, structures and procedures? This is especially true for vaccines that are tested on healthy people and therefore have a higher safe threshold for adverse side effects than drugs developed to treat people who are already sick. • Security as a concept resists and attempts a simple definition and is again inherently complex; Because of the moral issues involved, security is more important to many people than material security. For example, a death by murder is considered worse than a death in a car accident, although in many countries road deaths are more common than homicides. According to this definition, protection against external threats of a home and protection against internal structural and equipment failures (see meanings above) are not two types of security, but two aspects of the steady state of a home. Perceived low security can lead to costs. For example, after the 9/11 attacks in 2001, many people chose to drive rather than fly, even though even during terrorist attacks, flying is safer than driving. The perceived risk discourages people from walking and cycling for transportation, pleasure or exercise, even if the health benefits outweigh the risk of injury.

[4] The European Commission provides the legal framework, but different Member States may allow testing laboratories to carry out safety tests. There is substantial or objective certainty when the true safety story is favourable, whether standards are met or not. Why how we talk about security in an organization matters. Berthier, if there was one, confided to Bonaparte his secret plans, for he knew he could do it safely. This concern for security is now such a big problem, exacerbated by the “security nerds,” “security geeks,” and endless crusaders who have normalized a risk-aversion mindset. I am often called to organizations that care about security, many see my work as something of “behavior”, but that`s not what I am. Some people think my writing is about safety, but I don`t, and others want me to give “fixed” stories and illustrations about how to improve workplace safety, but I don`t. Can I only say that if your world is all about security, then your world is too small.

When I walk into organizations, I often start with a series of consultations, “visits,” observations and pre-training, and then I offer services or maybe a program, and it doesn`t take long for someone to come to me and say, “Rob, it`s not just about security, is it?” And when that happens, I know we`re starting to go somewhere. Also known as social security or public safety, security deals with the risk of harm caused by intentional criminal acts such as assault, burglary or vandalism. Many countries have accredited national organizations to test and/or submit test reports for safety certification. These are usually referred to as notified or competent bodies. A number of standards bodies publish safety standards. These can be voluntary organizations or government agencies. These agencies first define the safety standards, which they publish in the form of codes. They are also accreditation bodies and allow independent third parties such as testing and certification bodies to verify and ensure compliance with the standards they set. For example, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) has formulated a set of safety standards in its Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) and has accredited TÜV Rheinland to provide certification services to ensure products comply with defined safety regulations. [5] Juan de Messa lost his mind and ran down the stairs, thinking his safety was there. Security should not be about safety, but about life and learning.

When security is turned into a bureaucratic, legal or club exercise, it has lost action. That is why I prefer to talk much more about risk than security. The moment you tell someone you`re safe, they think you`re either the funny police force or a legal nerd who likes checklists. If security is a technical exercise of moving objects to keep a system clean, then I think we`ve lost the plot. If security is about memorizing parts of the law so that we can dominate and dominate others, then we have lost the plot. If security is a journey of power so that we can intimidate others to “protect them for their own good,” then we have lost the plot. Security should not be about any of these things. If we prioritize learning, people first, relationships first, respect first and life first, then we can get to the heart of safety. Here are my 7 1/2 minutes on why the way we talk about workplace safety is so important. Safety measures are activities and precautions that are taken to improve safety, that is: reduce risks to human health. Common safety measures include: Understanding that everyone thinks differently about safety becomes essential as we try to create a culture of safety excellence.

This shows how important it is to involve everyone in the organization – from the ground up – in the conversation. We need to change our mindset, rather than simply accepting top-down security communications and supporting their bottom-up ownership. Let`s combine these different employee perceptions of safety and, by supporting each one, we will take another big step towards safety excellence. There`s been a lot of heated discussion and chest slashes and on this website and safety forums lately, which is really healthy, but I thought we should all take a step back for a while, take a deep breath, let the dust sit and take a moment to think about what security really is. One of our colleagues – Sarah-Jane, The Safety Nerd, from Riskology Consulting, sent me this video yesterday.

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.